Fullscreen

aw1l 2.2 Methodology

Methodology

In the experience reported here, Wiki methodology was tested compared to traditional methodology (see below). A Wiki (Cunningham, 1998), in brief, is a simple tool that allows writing documents in web pages, easily editable by anyone of the group just with a simple web browser, plus it keeps a history of versions from the document, and it allows easy markup and access control. Wikis have been introduced in teaching and learning scenarios fairly recently (Schneider 2004, Prendes 2006).

Big and small groups of pupils have been used, in subjects of 1st and 2nd cycle, of several university degrees, and with several types of collaborative writing assignments or works (Table 1). In total, they have participated in the experience (in either way) more than 230 pupils, 10 teachers, 10 subjects among the first and second period of four months of the year and among the 5 different university degrees being implied, of two universities and an ascribed centre.

Permission denied

`Traditional´ vs. `Wiki´ methodology

In our experience we defined "Traditional methodology" as the process in which students:
  • create individual documents in computers not connected among themselves (for example, computer labs of teaching institutions are not in an intranet with individual houses)
  • exchange documents in paper, and/or magnetic support (diskette, CD, USB...), and/or by e-mail
  • manually watch that there are not simultaneous editions of the same version of the same sub-document, which would hamper the work of combining the sub-documents later on
  • make a manual management of document and sub-document versions, as well as of the changes that each one has introduced, and when he has introduced them.

And we defined "Wiki methodology" as the process in which students:
  • create individual documents in a web server with Wiki technology, which makes documents commonly accessible to all the members of the work group. This allows to be able to see and, in case it ¡s agreed, modify the documents of the other members of the group, as they keep on elaborating their documents, and not just in the final phase of joining the sub-documents of the work. It requires that no member fears that other members of the same work group have the ability to see or modify his/her document (all versions are saved and any modified or deleted information can be rescued).
  • do not have the need to exchange versions of documents among themselves; they are all accessible to all the work group at any time through a simple web browser
  • do not have the need to take special measures of security for avoiding the simultaneous editions of a same sub-document, since the tool itself (Wiki) warns when there is an attempt at simultaneous edition, and who is currently working on that document.
  • do not have the need to manually join changes together in the same document, since the changes are always integrated into the last version that is accessible in the server


Opinion from lecturers was collected through meetings in person, and opinions from students was collected through individual surveys, which included closed questions (answers ranging from 1 to 5) and empty spaces every several questions to allow extra comments. Students had to hand in the answered surveys to their teachers at the end of the term inside a closed envelope labeled with their name on it, and they were not opened until the grading of the group work was completely finished.


Contributors to this page: Xavier.dePedro and system .
Page last modified on Tuesday 06 de June, 2006 16:55:44 CEST by Xavier.dePedro.

Col·laboren [toggle]

ub.edu Logo UAB Logo
ourproject.org Logo Agaur Logo
Logo de l'ICE de la UB

Traduccions automàtiques [toggle]