Fullscreen

History: aw1l 3.2 Conclusions

Preview of version: 3

First VersionVersion

Conclusions

  • Teaching staff stated positive items of Wiki methodology (easiness and speed of access, version control, registry of who, when and what changed in each document, ...), even if some minor disadvantages were also noted.

  • Students from all subjects using Wiki methodology showed in surveys less negative comments regarding the difficulties of the methodology to accomplish the group work, than students with traditional methodology

  • Letting others to see or modify your work is worth, even when it's not finished and you fear that others read your "work in progress" which may be messy or with important gaps.

  • If some "good practice" recommendations are taken into account, there is a higher possibility that wiki methodology increases the efficency of writting documents cooperatively, respect to traditional methodology.


History

Legend: v=view , s=source , c=compare, d=diff
Information Version Html Action
Tue 06 de June, 2006 12:26 CEST by Xavier.dePedro from 83.180.166.105 4
Current
v  s
Sat 03 de June, 2006 16:21 CEST by Xavier.dePedro from 83.180.153.74 3 v  s  c  d
Fri 02 de June, 2006 12:07 CEST by Xavier.dePedro from 83.177.57.188 2 v  s  c  d
Fri 02 de June, 2006 11:43 CEST by system from 0.0.0.0
creat des d'estructura
1 v  s  c  d

Col·laboren [toggle]

ub.edu Logo UAB Logo
ourproject.org Logo Agaur Logo
Logo de l'ICE de la UB

Traduccions automàtiques [toggle]