History: aw1l 2.1 Introduction
Comparing version 3 with version 12
IntroductionThis experience is framed within the two projects (totally within the first, already finished, and partly with the second, still in active development) entitled:
New tools of collaborative work have been experimented in these projects (De Pedro et al., 2005), with several subjects and degrees, mainly from experimental sciences (Table 1). The degree of adequacy of the new tools and methodologies employed to writing up documents in group has been evaluated later on, in order to improve the performance of the students that they have used them, with respect to those that have used traditional methodology. In this communication, qualitative results from the cited projects is shown, whereas most of the quantitative results are shown in another communication (De Pedro et al. 2006). |
IntroductionThis experience is framed within the two projects (totally within the first, already finished, and partly with the second, still in active development) entitled:
New tools of collaborative work have been experimented in these projects (De Pedro 2004), with several subjects and degrees, mainly from experimental sciences (Table 1). The degree of adequacy of the new tools and methodologies employed to writing up documents in group has been evaluated later on (De Pedro et al., 2005a), in order to improve the performance and yield of the students that they have used them, with respect to those that have used traditional methodology, considering many factors that may affect them while learning at university (Figure 1). (unavailable - see the link at the bottom of the pagae to the pdf instead ) Figure 1. Some possible factors affecting low yield from students at university level (adapted from De Pedro, 2005b) After a pilot experience, TikiWiki CMS/Groupware collaborative portal web site (http://tikiwiki.org
Figure 2. Main web site for coordination of the UniWiki project, where optional training for students and teachers was held a total of 10 times along the two years of the project. In this communication, qualitative results from the cited projects are shown, whereas most of the quantitative results are shown in another communication (De Pedro et al. 2006). |
||
