History: aw1l 3.2 Conclusions
Comparing version 2 with version 4
|
@@ -Lines: 5-7 changed to +Lines: 5-11 @@
* Letting others to see or modify your work is worth, even when it's not finished and you fear that others read your "work in progress" which may be messy or with important gaps.
+
+ * The role of "Editor in chief" is very important and needed for higher final quality of the work produced, regardless of methodology followed. This task is apparently facilitated by Wiki methodology. + + * If some "good practice" recommendations are taken into account, there is a higher possibility that wiki methodology increases the efficency of writting documents cooperatively, respect to traditional methodology. |
History
Col·laboren
Traduccions automàtiques
